Remember me
[Forgot password?] [Register]
[Login]
menu

How to make VS a better place

<< First < Prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Next > Last >>

[Reply] #41
10-30-2013 12:23 PM
Joined: 09-10-2012
Posts: 77,118
offline
Izayoi
Izayoi
~Prince Swordsman~
Rep: 207

Speaker For The Dead wrote:

ZeedMillenniummon Fancy Mode wrote:

Speaker For The Dead wrote:

ZeedMillenniummon Fancy Mode wrote:

Speaker For The Dead wrote:

Yuki Nagato wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote: Remove all bias and favoritism from the Vs forum.



Pretty much this. It’s okay to disagree or agree in VS threads. But make it succinct and give reasons as to why character A beats character B with an iron fist. It’s easy to debate without using confrontational words. It just happens that hostility is pretty common here.



Fantastic suggestion. It will actually be in the new rules that “insert character solos” and the like will be considered spam and if done over and over will get you warned and eventually banned.

On the other hand, I WILL be fighting for a new part of VS for more joke-ish topics. OBD is bad, but their setups are nice. Having a “joke battledome” can alleviate the main section’s spam.

I’ve been saying that for a while, but whenever I suggested it, it was dismissed with lolOBD.



Never saw you suggest it. But let’s be honest. I’m Cid. I created VS to begin with. wink

I haven’t for a few months.

you did? shocked



Bjarne created VS and VS General, both at my own request. So yeah, in a way I did.

SO IT’S YOUR FAULT THAT YOU MADE THIS FORUM BECOME GARBAGE D<

YOU BETTER FIX IT!

(lol)


__________________

[Reply] #42
10-30-2013 12:23 PM
Joined: 09-18-2012
Posts: 16,643
offline
monster lord member
monster lord member
Hora hora~
Rep: 219

YuNarukami wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote: Make me a Games mod.

So inappropriate...


So? It still should happen.

We don’t need more mods for the Games section. Stop with the off-topic derping. :/


Ok, name 3 mods that specifically mod the Games and ONLY the Games section then.

3 Games mods aren’t necessary.


1 isn’t enough

Prove that 1 isn’t enough in another place.

[Reply] #43
10-30-2013 12:25 PM
Joined: 08-26-2013
Posts: 448
offline
Aomine Fanboy
Aomine Fanboy
Regular
Rep: 17

Ban people who don’t have proof or scans for their statements.

Ex- Character A can destroy an island or continent(even though this character has shown no feat of this magnitude or isn’t confirmed stronger than someone who has.)

Character B can move at MHS-Sub-Relativistic speeds(even if there’s no proof of this.)


__________________

Edited 10-30-2013 12:26 PM by Aomine Fanboy
[Reply] #44
10-30-2013 12:25 PM
Joined: 10-20-2013
Posts: 728
offline
TigerLover
TigerLover
Regular
Rep: 22

ZeedMillenniummon Fancy Mode wrote:

Speaker For The Dead wrote:

ZeedMillenniummon Fancy Mode wrote:

Speaker For The Dead wrote:

ZeedMillenniummon Fancy Mode wrote:

Speaker For The Dead wrote:

Yuki Nagato wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote: Remove all bias and favoritism from the Vs forum.



Pretty much this. It’s okay to disagree or agree in VS threads. But make it succinct and give reasons as to why character A beats character B with an iron fist. It’s easy to debate without using confrontational words. It just happens that hostility is pretty common here.



Fantastic suggestion. It will actually be in the new rules that “insert character solos” and the like will be considered spam and if done over and over will get you warned and eventually banned.

On the other hand, I WILL be fighting for a new part of VS for more joke-ish topics. OBD is bad, but their setups are nice. Having a “joke battledome” can alleviate the main section’s spam.

I’ve been saying that for a while, but whenever I suggested it, it was dismissed with lolOBD.



Never saw you suggest it. But let’s be honest. I’m Cid. I created VS to begin with. wink

I haven’t for a few months.

you did? shocked



Bjarne created VS and VS General, both at my own request. So yeah, in a way I did.

SO IT’S YOUR FAULT THAT YOU MADE THIS FORUM BECOME GARBAGE D<

YOU BETTER FIX IT!

(lol)

[Reply] #45
10-30-2013 12:26 PM
Joined: 02-09-2013
Posts: 18,893
offline
YuNarukami
YuNarukami
No one likes you lol
Rep: 168

Speaker For The Dead wrote:

YuNarukami wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote: Make me a Games mod.

So inappropriate...


So? It still should happen.

We don’t need more mods for the Games section. Stop with the off-topic derping. :/


Ok, name 3 mods that specifically mod the Games and ONLY the Games section then.

3 Games mods aren’t necessary.


1 isn’t enough



Yes it is. Now take your pleading for power to a thread where it belongs, please.


The part where I said I should be a mod was a joke. However, we really do need more than one person modding that section, dunno who tho.


__________________

[Reply] #46
10-30-2013 12:26 PM
Joined: 01-22-2008
Posts: 1,005
offline
Speaker For The Dead
Speaker For The Dead
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 22

The ideas of ban or restrictions on various thread types have been thrown around before. Does the general populace believe there’s any real merit to restricting threads as such? Personally I don’t see the point to locking threads needlessly, but I will take all suggestions into mind.


__________________

[Reply] #47
10-30-2013 12:26 PM
Joined: 02-09-2013
Posts: 18,893
offline
YuNarukami
YuNarukami
No one likes you lol
Rep: 168

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote: Make me a Games mod.

So inappropriate...


So? It still should happen.

We don’t need more mods for the Games section. Stop with the off-topic derping. :/


Ok, name 3 mods that specifically mod the Games and ONLY the Games section then.

3 Games mods aren’t necessary.


1 isn’t enough

Prove that 1 isn’t enough in another place.


like?


__________________

[Reply] #48
10-30-2013 12:27 PM
Joined: 09-10-2012
Posts: 77,118
offline
Izayoi
Izayoi
~Prince Swordsman~
Rep: 207

Aomine Fanboy wrote: Ban people who don’t have proof or scans for their statements.

Ex- Character A can destroy an island or continent(even though this character has shown no feat of this magnitude or isn’t confirmed stronger than someone who has.

Character B can move at MHS-Sub-Relativistic speeds(even if there’s no proof of this.)

People who purposely wanks a verse no matter what also need a little time out.



Just because there’s no proof doesn’t mean they’re wrong. Sometimes said stat is common knowledge, where the debater doesn’t know where to get the proof. Or, the debater has no access to getting proof, but does have statements (Zeed’s multiverse busting for example.)


__________________

[Reply] #49
10-30-2013 12:27 PM
Joined: 01-22-2008
Posts: 1,005
offline
Speaker For The Dead
Speaker For The Dead
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 22

Aomine Fanboy wrote: Ban people who don’t have proof or scans for their statements.

Ex- Character A can destroy an island or continent(even though this character has shown no feat of this magnitude or isn’t confirmed stronger than someone who has.)

Character B can move at MHS-Sub-Relativistic speeds(even if there’s no proof of this.)



Consistently avoiding showing proof to back up their claims could be considered spam. I will keep this mind when working up a new set of rules.


__________________

[Reply] #50
10-30-2013 12:28 PM
Joined: 09-18-2012
Posts: 16,643
offline
monster lord member
monster lord member
Hora hora~
Rep: 219

YuNarukami wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote: Make me a Games mod.

So inappropriate...


So? It still should happen.

We don’t need more mods for the Games section. Stop with the off-topic derping. :/


Ok, name 3 mods that specifically mod the Games and ONLY the Games section then.

3 Games mods aren’t necessary.


1 isn’t enough

Prove that 1 isn’t enough in another place.


like?

http://lounge.moviecodec.com/feedback/do-we-need-more-mods-or-global-mods-313765/

[Reply] #51
10-30-2013 12:28 PM
Joined: 10-20-2013
Posts: 728
offline
TigerLover
TigerLover
Regular
Rep: 22

I don’t think that becoming more strict with the Vs forum would help. I belive that it would only make it worst, as more trolls will try to go against the rules.

[Reply] #52
10-30-2013 12:29 PM
Joined: 02-09-2013
Posts: 18,893
offline
YuNarukami
YuNarukami
No one likes you lol
Rep: 168

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote:

YuNarukami wrote: Make me a Games mod.

So inappropriate...


So? It still should happen.

We don’t need more mods for the Games section. Stop with the off-topic derping. :/


Ok, name 3 mods that specifically mod the Games and ONLY the Games section then.

3 Games mods aren’t necessary.


1 isn’t enough

Prove that 1 isn’t enough in another place.


like?

http://lounge.moviecodec.com/feedback/do-we-need-more-mods-or-global-mods-313765/


Fine then.


__________________

[Reply] #53
10-30-2013 12:30 PM
Joined: 08-07-2013
Posts: 2,454
offline
Aegis
Aegis
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 71

Speaker For The Dead wrote:

Yuki Nagato wrote:

gothic lolita member wrote: Remove all bias and favoritism from the Vs forum.



Pretty much this. It’s okay to disagree or agree in VS threads. But make it succinct and give reasons as to why character A beats character B with an iron fist. It’s easy to debate without using confrontational words. It just happens that hostility is pretty common here.



Fantastic suggestion. It will actually be in the new rules that “insert character solos” and the like will be considered spam and if done over and over will get you warned and eventually banned.

On the other hand, I WILL be fighting for a new part of VS for more joke-ish topics. OBD is bad, but their setups are nice. Having a “joke battledome” can alleviate the main section’s spam.



Yeah, a joke battledome wouldn’t be so bad.

I don’t mind a member saying, "<insert character> solos." But at the very least, make a constructive argument; not just leave things hanging saying, “Goku can stomp <insert character> becuz he can destroy planets and that’s it." Point out each characters' strongest point and their weaknesses, compare their intelligence and such.

Edited 10-30-2013 12:32 PM by Aegis
[Reply] #54
10-30-2013 12:31 PM
Joined: 06-17-2011
Posts: 20,541
offline
znjfl
znjfl
The Heroes
Rep: 156

Im guessing this isnt in your power, but disabling the option that allows guests to make threads would be a great start.


Lets face it, vast majority of VS threads made by guests are locked withing 2-3 pages anyway, not having them in the first place would be the best option.


Stricter policies regarding trolling, and baiting.

I`m not saying ban all the trolls, the good trolls actually make it all more interesting, but the standard “Goku solos”, “Madara chucks a meteor”, “Ichigo flicks” etc is just annoying.


And going off topic should be much more limited.

Sometimes going a bit off topic can actually have connections with the topic itself, but changing it into something else entirely should be stopped.

The thread doesnt need to be locked(unless the debate is obviously over), but the ones taking it off topic should be banned from the thread.


__________________

[Reply] #55
10-30-2013 12:31 PM
Joined: 08-26-2013
Posts: 448
offline
Aomine Fanboy
Aomine Fanboy
Regular
Rep: 17

ZeedMillenniummon Fancy Mode wrote:

Aomine Fanboy wrote: Ban people who don’t have proof or scans for their statements.



Just because there’s no proof doesn’t mean they’re wrong. Sometimes said stat is common knowledge, where the debater doesn’t know where to get the proof. Or, the debater has no access to getting proof, but does have statements (Zeed’s multiverse busting for example.)


It’s like CID just explained up above. If they continuously avoid posting proof if people happen to disagree with their claims It should be considered spam.

They don’t have to be wrong. They just need something that proves them right.

If a character statement hasn’t been contradicted, isn’t an exaggeration, or actually makes sense then It’s perfectly usable.


__________________

Edited 10-30-2013 12:34 PM by Aomine Fanboy
[Reply] #56
10-30-2013 12:33 PM
Joined: 09-10-2012
Posts: 77,118
offline
Izayoi
Izayoi
~Prince Swordsman~
Rep: 207

Aomine Fanboy wrote:

ZeedMillenniummon Fancy Mode wrote:

Aomine Fanboy wrote: Ban people who don’t have proof or scans for their statements.

Ex- Character A can destroy an island or continent(even though this character has shown no feat of this magnitude or isn’t confirmed stronger than someone who has.

Character B can move at MHS-Sub-Relativistic speeds(even if there’s no proof of this.)

People who purposely wanks a verse no matter what also need a little time out.



Just because there’s no proof doesn’t mean they’re wrong. Sometimes said stat is common knowledge, where the debater doesn’t know where to get the proof. Or, the debater has no access to getting proof, but does have statements (Zeed’s multiverse busting for example.)


It’s like CID just explained up above. If they continuously avoid posting proof if people happen to disagree with their claims It should be considered spam.

They don’t have to be wrong. They just need something that proves them right.

By people disagreeing, I assume you mean the majority, yes? If 20 people say one thing, but one disagrees, but none of those 20 have ready proof, then what?


__________________

[Reply] #57
10-30-2013 12:35 PM
Joined: 09-18-2012
Posts: 16,643
offline
monster lord member
monster lord member
Hora hora~
Rep: 219

Please get rid of DBZ off-topic in other verse’s threads.

[Reply] #58
10-30-2013 12:36 PM
Joined: 12-18-2008
Posts: 20,179
offline
Zack.
Zack.
Addict (beyond 1337)
Rep: 226

ZeedMillenniummon Fancy Mode wrote: Seconded.

It’d be nice to have at least one mod online for every hour of the day to control spammers.



If we did that, every member of the site would end up being a mod.

Pocket Rocket is fine on his own.

[Reply] #59
10-30-2013 12:37 PM
Joined: 09-10-2012
Posts: 77,118
offline
Izayoi
Izayoi
~Prince Swordsman~
Rep: 207

Zack. wrote:

ZeedMillenniummon Fancy Mode wrote: Seconded.

It’d be nice to have at least one mod online for every hour of the day to control spammers.



If we did that, every member of the site would end up being a mod.

Pocket Rocket is fine on his own.

I guess so.


__________________

[Reply] #60
10-30-2013 12:38 PM
Joined: 08-07-2013
Posts: 2,454
offline
Aegis
Aegis
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 71

ZeedMillenniummon Fancy Mode wrote:

Aomine Fanboy wrote:

ZeedMillenniummon Fancy Mode wrote:

Aomine Fanboy wrote: Ban people who don’t have proof or scans for their statements.

Ex- Character A can destroy an island or continent(even though this character has shown no feat of this magnitude or isn’t confirmed stronger than someone who has.

Character B can move at MHS-Sub-Relativistic speeds(even if there’s no proof of this.)

People who purposely wanks a verse no matter what also need a little time out.



Just because there’s no proof doesn’t mean they’re wrong. Sometimes said stat is common knowledge, where the debater doesn’t know where to get the proof. Or, the debater has no access to getting proof, but does have statements (Zeed’s multiverse busting for example.)


It’s like CID just explained up above. If they continuously avoid posting proof if people happen to disagree with their claims It should be considered spam.

They don’t have to be wrong. They just need something that proves them right.

By people disagreeing, I assume you mean the majority, yes? If 20 people say one thing, but one disagrees, but none of those 20 have ready proof, then what?



Then the said thread shall be closed.

<< First < Prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Next > Last >>

New Reply
Name (guest):

For faster posting and no restrictions: [Login] [Register]

Message:


 
 

[More Options] [New Topic]
Moderated by: Phobetius, Zeroextra, znjfl, The Ancient Apocalypse, Hanbei, - FS -, Admins, Superusers [All moderators]
The Lounge Forums ©Silicon.dk ApS 2012 - Privacy Policy - Disclaimer - FAQ - Contact