Remember me
[Forgot password?] [Register]
[Login]
menu

Goku Vs Superman Vs Naruto Vs Ichigo Vs Luffy Vs HST Vs Dragon Ball Z Vs Bleach x One Piece V Toriko

<< First < Prev 1 [2]

[Reply] #21
01-28-2013 02:15 PM
Joined: 06-24-2012
Posts: 12,907
offline
OrganizationXV
OrganizationXV
Reclaiming what's lost
Rep: 113

The First and Only wrote:

OrganizationXV wrote:

The First and Only wrote:

Sekundes wrote: Edward would actually win. Given that he is faster and can rip Harry apart. Twilight vampires are pretty hax and tough.



nah. all harry would do is just teleport to keep up with his speed. and he can use the instakill spell. there are lots of ways to kill this guy


I don’t think he could react to Edward’s speed, because he’d have to start the spell itself. Edward probably kills him first.

Switching sides like a boss.




actually he can dodge spells, which are roughly at half the speed of light. when voldemort used advara kadavra harry died before he knew it. you’d better switch sides again XD harry could harry petrificis totalus and freeze him, slow him down, or fling him upside down in the air and leave him there forever.


It’s never been said spells were lightning speed, and wizards are only muggles with magical ability.Harry could do all of the things you mentioned, but only given the time to act, which he doesn’t have against Edward.

Edited 01-28-2013 02:17 PM by OrganizationXV
[Reply] #22
01-28-2013 02:15 PM
Joined: 07-25-2012
Posts: 8,322
offline
Seiryu
Seiryu
THIS FIST CREATED ALL
Rep: 103

He’s not fast enough to react to a T-Vamp

Edward punches his face in


__________________



BURN IT UP!

MAJIN GO!

[Reply] #23
01-28-2013 02:18 PM
Joined: 01-31-2008
Posts: 55,431
offline
Xehanort the Younger
Xehanort the Younger
Not the bald one
Rep: 344

The First and Only wrote:

Seiryu wrote: Firebolt is Faster than Harry, proof of spells being light/lightning speed?

That’s how fucking slow he is.

Edward rips his head off.



i said that spells kill before anyone knows it. that has to be fast at least. :/ edawrd cant do that, because harry could just use his shield to cover over him.


Human synapses fire through the brain to produce a reaction at about .33 seconds. It matters how far apart they are but Edward is faster than the eye can see and one punch will kill Harry. Edward is pretty tough.

[Reply] #24
01-28-2013 02:22 PM
Joined: 08-06-2011
Posts: 25,251
offline
Pocket Rocket
Pocket Rocket
Hero of Hyrule
Rep: 215

It’s a shame that such a shitty character from a shitty series has to be overpowered because Stephanie Meyer wanted to make a “vampire” she thinks is unkillable.


__________________

[Reply] #25
01-28-2013 02:23 PM
Joined: 01-20-2013
Posts: 662
offline
The First and Only
The First and Only
Regular
Rep: 26

Sekundes wrote:

The First and Only wrote:

Seiryu wrote: Firebolt is Faster than Harry, proof of spells being light/lightning speed?

That’s how fucking slow he is.

Edward rips his head off.



i said that spells kill before anyone knows it. that has to be fast at least. :/ edawrd cant do that, because harry could just use his shield to cover over him.


Human synapses fire through the brain to produce a reaction at about .33 seconds. It matters how far apart they are but Edward is faster than the eye can see and one punch will kill Harry. Edward is pretty tough.



pfft, edward tough. not if he is transfigured into a rat and set on fire by bombarda XD im not saying edward isnt immortal, but he can feel pain though. and what is edward going to do by a simple 2st year spell as expelliarus? edward cant fly, so all harry has to do to spook him is wingardium leviousa.

[Reply] #26
01-28-2013 02:27 PM
Joined: 06-24-2012
Posts: 12,907
offline
OrganizationXV
OrganizationXV
Reclaiming what's lost
Rep: 113

The First and Only wrote:

Sekundes wrote:

The First and Only wrote:

Seiryu wrote: Firebolt is Faster than Harry, proof of spells being light/lightning speed?

That’s how fucking slow he is.

Edward rips his head off.



i said that spells kill before anyone knows it. that has to be fast at least. :/ edawrd cant do that, because harry could just use his shield to cover over him.


Human synapses fire through the brain to produce a reaction at about .33 seconds. It matters how far apart they are but Edward is faster than the eye can see and one punch will kill Harry. Edward is pretty tough.



pfft, edward tough. not if he is transfigured into a rat and set on fire by bombarda XD im not saying edward isnt immortal, but he can feel pain though. and what is edward going to do by a simple 2st year spell as expelliarus? edward cant fly, so all harry has to do to spook him is wingardium leviousa.


If Edward can just sit there and let him, yes. But- and listen carefully- he won’t. HARRY IS NOT FAST ENOUGH. Edward will make his move before Harry can even decide which spell he’d use first. By the time he grabbed his wand, Edward will have punched him out.

[Reply] #27
01-28-2013 02:30 PM
Joined: 01-20-2013
Posts: 662
offline
The First and Only
The First and Only
Regular
Rep: 26

OrganizationXV wrote:

The First and Only wrote:

Sekundes wrote:

The First and Only wrote:

Seiryu wrote: Firebolt is Faster than Harry, proof of spells being light/lightning speed?

That’s how fucking slow he is.

Edward rips his head off.



i said that spells kill before anyone knows it. that has to be fast at least. :/ edawrd cant do that, because harry could just use his shield to cover over him.


Human synapses fire through the brain to produce a reaction at about .33 seconds. It matters how far apart they are but Edward is faster than the eye can see and one punch will kill Harry. Edward is pretty tough.



pfft, edward tough. not if he is transfigured into a rat and set on fire by bombarda XD im not saying edward isnt immortal, but he can feel pain though. and what is edward going to do by a simple 2st year spell as expelliarus? edward cant fly, so all harry has to do to spook him is wingardium leviousa.


If Edward can just sit there and let him, yes. But- and listen carefully- he won’t. HARRY IS NOT FAST ENOUGH. Edward will make his move before Harry can even decide which spell he’d use first. By the time he grabbed his wand, Edward will have punched him out.



but harry is a horcrux. you cant kill him-nothing can. unless you have the sword of griffindor, or a basilisk fang, both of which edward does not have. look, even the creator herself said that edward would have no chance against harry. XD what makes you think you know more than her? harry is pratically immortal, too.

[Reply] #28
01-28-2013 02:33 PM
Joined: 07-25-2012
Posts: 8,322
offline
Seiryu
Seiryu
THIS FIST CREATED ALL
Rep: 103

First NLF because Tom Riddle also said he’d 'live forever' then died ~30 minutes later (movie time). Not to mention his immortality sucked ass as well since he could still get mutilated.

Second who said Edward wouldn’t beat harry and cite your source? They don’t even have the same creator seriously wtf?

Third Knockouts are a win even if he couldn’t die.

Fourth he still gets wounded so he’s not invincible and gets his shit wrecked.


__________________



BURN IT UP!

MAJIN GO!

Edited 01-28-2013 02:35 PM by Seiryu
[Reply] #29
01-28-2013 02:35 PM
Joined: 07-12-2011
Posts: 1,044
offline
kittenswithmittens
kittenswithmittens
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 43

EDWARD RIPS HIS HEAD OFF! END DISCUSSION

[Reply] #30
01-28-2013 02:36 PM
Joined: 08-24-2010
Posts: 18,353
offline
Scuba Steve
Scuba Steve
Comatose
Rep: 211

Harry, for not being a faggot.


__________________

[Reply] #31
01-28-2013 02:37 PM
Joined: 01-20-2013
Posts: 662
offline
The First and Only
The First and Only
Regular
Rep: 26

Seiryu wrote: First NLF because Tom Riddle also said he’d 'live forever' then died ~30 minutes later (movie time). Not to mention his immortality sucked ass as well since he could still get mutilated.

Second who said Edward wouldn’t beat harry and cite your source? They don’t even have the same creator seriously wtf?

Third Knockouts are a win even if he couldn’t die.

Fourth he still gets wounded so he’s not invincible and gets his shit wrecked.



didnt i just say in order to destroy a horcrux is to get a baslisk fang or the sword of griffindor? thats what how voldemort died. but edward has none of them so harry id virtually immortal.

[Reply] #32
01-28-2013 02:41 PM
Joined: 07-25-2012
Posts: 8,322
offline
Seiryu
Seiryu
THIS FIST CREATED ALL
Rep: 103

So Harry gets knocked out and Edward still wins?

Harry gets knocked out and Edward still wins.


__________________



BURN IT UP!

MAJIN GO!

[Reply] #33
01-28-2013 02:43 PM
Joined: 01-31-2008
Posts: 55,431
offline
Xehanort the Younger
Xehanort the Younger
Not the bald one
Rep: 344

The First and Only wrote:

Seiryu wrote: First NLF because Tom Riddle also said he’d 'live forever' then died ~30 minutes later (movie time). Not to mention his immortality sucked ass as well since he could still get mutilated.

Second who said Edward wouldn’t beat harry and cite your source? They don’t even have the same creator seriously wtf?

Third Knockouts are a win even if he couldn’t die.

Fourth he still gets wounded so he’s not invincible and gets his shit wrecked.



didnt i just say in order to destroy a horcrux is to get a baslisk fang or the sword of griffindor? thats what how voldemort died. but edward has none of them so harry id virtually immortal.


Alright how about this. Edward rips Harry to shreds and Harry wishes he were dead.

The end.

[Reply] #34
08-28-2019 12:05 AM
German        boy
Guest

Bump

<< First < Prev 1 [2]

New Reply
Name (guest):

For faster posting and no restrictions: [Login] [Register]

Message:


 
 

[More Options] [New Topic]
Moderated by: Phobetius, Zeroextra, znjfl, The Ancient Apocalypse, Hanbei, - FS -, Admins, Superusers [All moderators]
The Lounge Forums ©Silicon.dk ApS 2012 - Privacy Policy - Disclaimer - FAQ - Contact