Remember me
[Forgot password?] [Register]
[Login]
menu

New Reply

New Reply
Your name:


For faster posting and no restrictions: [Login] [Register]



Topic:
How Much Longer Does Religion Have

Message:


Smileys:


Spam prevention:


 


Click only once, it may take up to 30 seconds to post.
By submitting this form you agree to our posting rules, privacy policy and our disclaimer.

Topic Review (Latest First)

Posted by Guess3390
03-03-2019 02:21 PM

Religion is as old as mankind. And will always be.

Posted by The Matadors
05-17-2016 01:59 AM

You’re a very emotional person. A little too emotional.

Posted by lmfao I cant even
05-16-2016 11:28 PM

The Matadors wrote:

Once again mataderp fails wrote: Once again, the mexican autist never fails to amaze with the depths of his own stupidity. Apparently you’ve never heard of an “understood subject” in grammar before.

Also ladies and gentleman, here we it is! Mataderp’s signature move, “Just quote iconic historical figures and somehow it’ll make me seem like I actually know what I’m talking about!"

You disgust me you sub-human filth.


Wow.
I point out a grammar error and he goes crazy.
The only place where I have appeared superior to you is in your own head, chill. I’m sure you’re an intelligent kid irl, so there’s nothing to feel insecure about. I make threads, such as this one, and read interesting books because it entertains me. I don’t do it to allude intellectual superiority over you.


Is this nigga really acting like he got the high ground? really? Two pages of straight up bullshit lmfao. Good Night, kid.

Posted by The Matadors
05-16-2016 10:05 PM

mataderp still doesnt get it wrote: It’s not a grammar error, we’ve been through this.

I’m done trying to argue with you pulling shit out of your ass with every post, rot on this dying site for all I care.


It’s *in. But you already knew that.

Posted by The Matadors
05-16-2016 09:48 PM

Once again mataderp fails wrote: Once again, the mexican autist never fails to amaze with the depths of his own stupidity. Apparently you’ve never heard of an “understood subject” in grammar before.

Also ladies and gentleman, here we it is! Mataderp’s signature move, “Just quote iconic historical figures and somehow it’ll make me seem like I actually know what I’m talking about!"

You disgust me you sub-human filth.


Wow.
I point out a grammar error and he goes crazy.
The only place where I have appeared superior to you is in your own head, chill. I’m sure you’re an intelligent kid irl, so there’s nothing to feel insecure about. I make threads, such as this one, and read interesting books because it entertains me. I don’t do it to allude intellectual superiority over you.

Posted by mataderp still doesnt get it
05-16-2016 09:46 PM

It’s not a grammar error, we’ve been through this.

I’m done trying to argue with you pulling shit out of your ass with every post, rot on this dying site for all I care.

Posted by The Matadors
05-16-2016 09:35 PM

That doesn’t apply here.

Context: Joe found his best friend, Ted.

Their your man vs there you are man vs there’s your man vs there you’re man vs they’re your man.


You can use any of those, but they’re not correct. Even if we know what they mean. “Their you’re man” is not correct even if we know what they mean. A grammar mistake, is still a mistake [ here we can apply understood subject and gather that what is still the mistake is your original post and grammar (mistake)].

Posted by Once again mataderp fails
05-16-2016 09:14 PM

Once again, the mexican autist never fails to amaze with the depths of his own stupidity. Apparently you’ve never heard of an “understood subject” in grammar before.

Also ladies and gentleman, here we it is! Mataderp’s signature move, “Just quote iconic historical figures and somehow it’ll make me seem like I actually know what I’m talking about!"

You disgust me you sub-human filth.

Posted by Macho
05-16-2016 08:34 PM

mataderp you are a retard wrote:

Upu is dumb wrote:

Upupupu.... wrote: pseudo intellectual topics like this are exactly why nobody likes you...


Topics=many
This=one
Are=many
Grammar level = 0


>'this' is being compared to 'pseudo-intellectual topics'
>this is singular because it refers to this ONE thread while 'pseudo-intellectual topics' is plural because it’s being compared to the many other shit threads made by you that are like this.
>arguing semantics because you know you’re wrong and don’t have an argument

smfh, I’m washing my hands of a hopeless mentally-inept failure like you.


Your sentence is wrong, plain and simple. If you bothered to actually use commas maybe you (if you had the knowledge) could fix it.
And it’s not semantics, it’s proper grammar. We use it to communicate.

“Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please."


“The difference between the right word and the almost right word is the difference between lightning and a lightning bug." - Mark Twain.

Edited 05-16-2016 08:35 PM by Macho
Posted by Macho
05-16-2016 08:20 PM

Ricdog wrote:

You could have just stopped at not being interested in debates, the rest is just feel good self endorsements. Really I should have known this when you decided to equate Stalin with the whole Soviet Union.

Facts are one thing, stating faulty conclusions from them is another.

You gave a source. Does it give you better credibility? Considering that such a source wouldn’t even be considered credible in entry level language/debate classes, I say the answer is....meh.


I’m not going to use Google Scholar for debates online.

Done, I’ll edit my post then.

Up to ten (10) latest replies / posts from the original topic shown.

The Lounge Forums ©Silicon.dk ApS 2012 - Privacy Policy - Disclaimer - FAQ - Contact