Remember me
[Forgot password?] [Register]
[Login]
menu

New Reply

New Reply
Your name:


For faster posting and no restrictions: [Login] [Register]



Topic:
Analyzing Text

Message:


Smileys:


Spam prevention:


 


Click only once, it may take up to 30 seconds to post.
By submitting this form you agree to our posting rules, privacy policy and our disclaimer.

Topic Review (Latest First)

Posted by Macho
10-09-2016 02:29 AM

Bump.

Posted by Deus Ex Nihilo
02-12-2015 04:26 PM

MeIvin wrote: Hey man I’m not up here typing up tl;dr fights

No but you do live on MVC.

Posted by Helly The God
02-12-2015 04:22 PM

Hey man I’m not up here typing up tl;dr fights

Posted by Deus Ex Nihilo
02-12-2015 04:21 PM

MeIvin wrote: You two losers need to step outside more often, tbh

You’re the last person who should be telling this to anyone lol.

Posted by Helly The God
02-12-2015 04:14 PM

You two losers need to step outside more often, tbh

Posted by Van Hohenheim NLI
02-12-2015 04:05 PM

Deus Ex Nihilo wrote: Then yet you’re so deadset on trying to prove me wrong, Idk about you but when it comes to stupid people I ignore them, and only entertain their nonsense when I’m bored.


It’s not so much as proving you wrong, rather exposing your stupidity.
You’re one here almost every time I respond to you or come online to respond to me when I post, you must have a boring life if you’re on here almost 24/7 to entertain “nonsense”.

Tez wrote:
That’s why I ignored you for the longest time, same with Ophanim. But recently you two have become even bigger pest than before so I had to get my raid.


You don’t ignore me, lol. You only say you will, but a few post later you’re addressing me.

Tez wrote:
LMAO wtf? Fluid is commonly associated with liquids 9/10 of the time.


So? Are you suggesting there the same thing? Because that’s what you seem to be implying.

Tez wrote:
I know, everyone except you and that one Moo milk faggot, the thing you two have in common is you were both owned in a debate by me and now you have a vendetta.


I would tell you to stop living in a delusion, but you would only respond with: “no you”. Or some other irrelevant shit.


Tez wrote:
People like to dickride females on this site ironically enough.If she was a guy and had that kind of spunk no one would have commented, Moses never owned me in anything, it’s all a matter of opinion at the end of the day.

And you definitely have never owned anyone your entire worthless existence spent on this backwater forum


You’re fucking stupid if you think people were white knighting her. It’s a disadvantage to be a women in this forum because you get more shit. Yet people took her side over yours.
No, it’s not a matter of opinion. You just don’t understand when you’ve been bitch slapped.
Did I hit a nerve?

Tez wrote:
Yes I know that’s why you’re butthurt, I call you stupid and deep down you know it’s a fact. You absolutely hate it when I call you a moron because it cuts really deep. Idk if it opens up some emotional childhood scars or what, but you try way too hard to try to look smart and intelligent but it only ends up making yourself look like a pseudo intellectual moron, I’ve pointed it out, Ancient Apoc pointed it out, and a few other people in this thread pointed out how you’re a pathetic try hard for no reason.


People who I make mad, obviously have rage issues with me. I call them out on stupidity and they immediately feel offended and abuse the the word pseudo intellectual. Every time someone calls me a pseudo intellectual, I know they’re mad because they lose their shit and use words they don’t even understand.
I am, what I am, and you are, what you are. I’ve collected enough of your quotes to display your stupidity in full light, hence why you’re stupid. People don’t even need to see read through all your arguments now because I’ve condense what you are, already; and what you are is -quite honestly and sadly- a stupid-pathetic-dishonest human being.
I honestly dislike people like you.

Tez wrote:
You call me a hypocrite, in then in the exact same breathe say I’m immune to facts, while you’re ignoring the reason why plasma is named plasma lol, ok Mataderp.


I’m not ignoring it. You just don’t understand that there is a difference between fluid and liquid, when it comes to chemistry.

Tez wrote:

Van wrote:
You’re telling me you already knew who Irving was? Just watch Tez not answer the question.

Yes.


A lier to the end, I see. When did you first learn about him? And why?

Tez wrote:

Van wrote:
Notice that posting an image of blood plasma to show there is such a thing (for no reason at all) blood plasma, is different than mentioning blood plasma to indicate why plasma is called plasma.

Do you think it’s a coincidence I posted that picture and plasma was named plasma because of how it flows like blood plasma?


I honestly -and wouldn’t put it past you- believe you thought blood plasma and plasma are the same thing, and you probably still do.
Where does it say it flows like blood plasma? It says Irving noticed plasma carries ions and electrons like blood plasma carries germs and red and white corpuscles. It says nothing about it flowing like blood plasma.
You want us to believe you already knew all this stuff about plasma, but you don’t seem to know the difference between fluid and liquid and you keep saying Irving named plasma--plasma, because he saw he saw “it flows like blood plasma”, even though it doesn’t say that.

Tez wrote:

Van wrote:
Because that had nothing to do with the Sun’s plasma nor with how plasma was also a liquid.

I was just trying to prove that plasma actually can be dense and flow like liquid.


Exactly, that’s why I question whether you actually even knew what plasma was. There is clear difference between liquids and plasma. Plasma does behave like a fluid-just like gas does as well- but I don’t understand how someone that knows so much about plasma would say plasma flows like a liquid.

Tez wrote:

Van wrote:
You’re welcomed to go look back at your quotes. Why did you say you mixed up blood plasma and plasma?

Simplifying I just sort of had both in mind when I thought of plasma


That’s what I’ve been saying and you denying. You thought blood plasma was the same thing as plasma.
But, now you deny it.

Tez wrote:
No you fucking idiot, jesus christ I explained this a million times already and the only retard who’s short bus seems to be slow to the field trip is yours.


No-one believes you.

Tez wrote:
Wrong about what? That plasma can flow like liquid which I was completely right about?


Except it doesn’t say flow like liquid.

Tez wrote:
At least you can admit here you were ignorant, though I thought you’d AT LEAST do your research in the middle of the debate.


Yeah I do admit when I’m wrong. You on the other-hand, don’t. You want us to believe someone that is scientifically illiterate, already knew everything about plasma before the debate began.
Why would I do research of something I already have a basic understanding of?
I don’t use google-fu.

Tez wrote:

Van wrote:
What you want us to believe is that:
1.) By showing an image of blood plasma you were going to win the debate of how the plasma was liquid substance.

False.


Yet you keep saying plasma flows like a liquid.

Tez wrote:

Van wrote:
2.) You didn’t directly state something you would have done, if you knew about it. The same way you post images of things to the nature I explained.

Ummm, what?


It basically means you didn’t know what you were talking about, you thought blood plasma was another form of plasma. If you had all this knowledge of plasma before hand you would of actually used the knowledge in the debate. But instead you suddenly know even who coined the term plasma and why. And all this you knew already before we started to debate. You the same guy who is scientifically illiterate.

Tez wrote:
lmfao. Oh my goodness....the stupidity...


Is it more stupid than saying the stars are made of a liquid substance? Just look at the hypocrisy, this is why I give you a hard time.
And fluid and liquid are still not the same thing. But of course, you already knew this, even though you implied the opposite before you said you already knew this.


Tez wrote: So basically, it behaves like liquid plasma and because of that, it was named after it.

Or are you going to continue to deny this fact?


This is why I don’t believe you know basic science.
It’s not liquid plasma, it’s blood plasma. Even when you claim you didn’t mean plasma is a liquid you still give hints that you don’t know what you’re talking about, and are just lying.

Tez wrote:
You just seem confused honestly.


No, I just assumed you knew the difference between fluid and liquid.

Posted by Deus Ex Nihilo
02-12-2015 03:34 AM

Van Hohenheim NLI wrote: The ghost of Mark Twain is haunting me now, lol. He couldn’t be more right about stupid people dragging you down to their level and beating you at their game.

Then yet you’re so deadset on trying to prove me wrong, Idk about you but when it comes to stupid people I ignore them, and only entertain their nonsense when I’m bored.


That’s why I ignored you for the longest time, same with Ophanim. But recently you two have become even bigger pest than before so I had to get my raid.


A correction I would like to make is that plasma does behave like a fluid,not liquid, but fluid. Only one state doesn’t and it should be obvious which, if you haven’t debated Tez

LMAO wtf? Fluid is commonly associated with liquids 9/10 of the time.


That sentence was part of the first post of were I mentioned Irving, I don’t know why it was placed here. Your flip-flopping and trying to anticipate your BS excuses is making it hard to concentrate.

“NUH UH, MY SENTENCE JUST RANDOMLY CHANGED FOR NO REASON IT WASN’T MY FAULT”



Everyone understands what you implied.

I know, everyone except you and that one Moo milk faggot, the thing you two have in common is you were both owned in a debate by me and now you have a vendetta.



If you want to discuss that particular text, then bring it here.

No need, I’m just using that as an example on how you’re a gigantic iar.


Let me put this in the universal, not so openly spoken in public, way people look at you. We all know your too stupid to understand when you’ve been beaten or humiliated.

You seem to be projecting a bit here, I’m not the one making two separate topics branched from one long dead topic, you take this as serious a sa heart attack and you know it.

Even if I were to give my account to the best debater in the world and he were to give you a spanking, you wouldn’t be able to process that you got a beating.

It’s a shame you are nearly the complete opposite of the best debater in the world.


Moses, owned you when he was here.I, own you. Clementine, owned you-and the funny part was that everyone was saying you got owned, but you couldn’t compute it. Facts, own you.

People like to dickride females on this site ironically enough.If she was a guy and had that kind of spunk no one would have commented, Moses never owned me in anything, it’s all a matter of opinion at the end of the day.


And you definitely have never owned anyone your entire worthless existence spent on this backwater forum


The reason why I give you a hard time is because you call other people stupid, I’ve said this before

Yes I know that’s why you’re butthurt, I call you stupid and deep down you know it’s a fact. You absolutely hate it when I call you a moron because it cuts really deep. Idk if it opens up some emotional childhood scars or what, but you try way too hard to try to look smart and intelligent but it only ends up making yourself look like a pseudo intellectual moron, I’ve pointed it out, Ancient Apoc pointed it out, and a few other people in this thread pointed out how you’re a pathetic try hard for no reason.


I don’t like hypocrites. And what other better way to prove you’re wrong than to call you out in scientific mistakes? But, like I mentioned before, you’re immune to facts.

You call me a hypocrite, in then in the exact same breathe say I’m immune to facts, while you’re ignoring the reason why plasma is named plasma lol, ok Mataderp.



I already told you to prove what electrified fluid was, in the part you snipped out.

It says it on the tin, that’s like asking me what dirty socks are.



You’re telling me you already knew who Irving was? Just watch Tez not answer the question.

Yes.


Lol, no you didn’t. If that was what you were intending you would have been more clear.

Nah I wanted to see if you actually knew what I was referencing, but at least you admit you didn’t know what the fuck it was so broad assumption on my part.


Notice that posting an image of blood plasma to show there is such a thing (for no reason at all) blood plasma, is different than mentioning blood plasma to indicate why plasma is called plasma.

Do you think it’s a coincidence I posted that picture and plasma was named plasma because of how it flows like blood plasma?


Because that had nothing to do with the Sun’s plasma nor with how plasma was also a liquid.

I was just trying to prove that plasma actually can be dense and flow like liquid.


You’re welcomed to go look back at your quotes. Why did you say you mixed up blood plasma and plasma?

Simplifying I just sort of had both in mind when I thought of plasma


Oh yeah, because you thought blood plasma was also plasma.

No you fucking idiot, jesus christ I explained this a million times already and the only retard who’s short bus seems to be slow to the field trip is yours.


Just man up and admit you were wrong. Have I shattered your e-rep, so much that you don’t even want to admit anymore that you’re wrong?

Wrong about what? That plasma can flow like liquid which I was completely right about?


The only thing I know about plasma is its composition and some general equations for it, that’s it; the basic stuff you learn at school. I didn’t learn nor inquire who discovered it nor how or why or when.

At least you can admit here you were ignorant, though I thought you’d AT LEAST do your research in the middle of the debate.


What you want us to believe is that:
1.) By showing an image of blood plasma you were going to win the debate of how the plasma was liquid substance.

False.


2.) You didn’t directly state something you would have done, if you knew about it. The same way you post images of things to the nature I explained.

Ummm, what?


3.) You already knew all this stuff about plasma, before the debate.

Correct.


This can’t be believe by a thinking person.

Well, you’re not a thinking person.



I already know what it means. I was mistakenly associating liquid with fluid

lmfao. Oh my goodness....the stupidity...


So electrified fluid is referring to plasma.
But this doesn’t mean it behaves like a liquid as you said before

So basically, it behaves like liquid plasma and because of that, it was named after it.

Or are you going to continue to deny this fact?


You keep flip-flopping and it’s getting tiring and annoying.

You just seem confused honestly.

Edited 02-12-2015 03:37 AM by Deus Ex Nihilo
Posted by Van Hohenheim NLI
02-12-2015 03:10 AM

RussianCoffeeAddict wrote:
A lot of topics not even about stuff like this (a statement) doesn’t require as much text and wording.
It could have been a lot simpler, and still get the point across.
Also: Why isn’t this in VS?


Some people require a little more effort, if you know what I mean.

It could, but not everyone is to that level just yet.

Because we’re analyzing all types of text, from a wide area of writing.

Posted by PG15
02-12-2015 03:07 AM

Van Hohenheim NLI wrote:

RussianCoffeeAddict wrote:
Also, you could have concluded that it was figurative without making a wall of text.
Anyone could without typing anything...


It wouldn’t be much of a thread with minimal effort put into it.


A lot of topics not even about stuff like this (a statement) doesn’t require as much text and wording.
It could have been a lot more simple, and still get the point across.
Also: Why isn’t this in VS?

Edited 02-12-2015 03:12 AM by PG15
Posted by Van Hohenheim NLI
02-12-2015 03:03 AM

RussianCoffeeAddict wrote:
Also, you could have concluded that it was figurative without making a wall of text.
Anyone could without typing anything...


It wouldn’t be much of a thread with minimal effort put into it.

Up to ten (10) latest replies / posts from the original topic shown.

The Lounge Forums ©Silicon.dk ApS 2012 - Privacy Policy - Disclaimer - FAQ - Contact