Remember me
[Forgot password?] [Register]
[Login]
menu

what would the world be without tech. !

<< First < Prev 1 2 [3] 4 Next > Last >>

[Reply] #41
04-05-2010 08:50 PM
Joined: 02-06-2010
Posts: 4,834
offline
AfterGlow.
AfterGlow.
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 78

Heart Break Kid wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

Heart Break Kid wrote: More than likely the thread creator was referring to things from 20th century-now. Things like cars, computers,etc.

At least that is the usual thought of technology. Technology is pretty vague though.



It’s extremely vague.

There was plenty of technology during the 19th century.
It’s not a world without technology.

A world without technology would be the stone-age, before humans acquired enough intelligence to use tools.

So, we’d be animals, relying on instincts.


And there we have it. Unless the TC comes in and says anything else about it.



I doubt she will.

pretty much /thread

[Reply] #42
04-05-2010 08:50 PM
Joined: 10-05-2007
Posts: 21,426
offline
Marly
Marly
that's enough... too far...
Rep: 190

Ugh... Seriously...


__________________

[Reply] #43
04-05-2010 08:50 PM
Joined: 09-07-2007
Posts: 4,399
offline
surferdude1212
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 56

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote: I see people are still discussing your post about this thread not existing? Oh wait, nobody discussed it to begin with.

Some other troll quoted it to get a foothold for further trolling/OT.

The thread is in the off-topic section because the subject doesn’t fit in another section, this doesn’t mean that it’s free to spam it with off-topic remarks.

Stick to the subject or don’t post.
I pointed out that this thread is worthless because the creator didn’t contribute anything to it or even bothered to specify what technology she was referring to.

surferdude1212 wrote: it started a different discussion in which you dont like to be a part of so dont complain



“Don’t complain about me spamming the thread, take part of it or STFU, derp”

surferdude1212 wrote: also rofl at that definition, in it, it has a different version of the verb discuss XD fail def



It’s called synonyms retard.



do u really think i said take part or STFU? rofl

and that definition part wasnt about calling you fail i was calling the definition fail for using a dif form of the word, and thats not a synonym. by saying discuss is a synonym for discussion is like saying run is a synonym for running

so dont be getting all mad cause im screwing around



Discussion: The act of discussing.

If you think there’s something wrong with this definition, you’re really stupid.



no i find it funny because the definition of the word is partly the word



My God, have you never read a dictionary before?



really? read the dictionary?



What do you do? Teleport the written information into your head?



yes i do ty, its my form of learning wink

and im off i really dislike arguing, nobody really goes anywhere and soon we will find each other repeating stuff lol


__________________


[Reply] #44
04-05-2010 08:57 PM
Joined: 11-09-2008
Posts: 30,879
offline
Aigis
Aigis
Eat shit Parker
Rep: 144

Heart Break Kid wrote: You guys have seriously never opened a dictionary? :|

I have,but don’t read it.It’s not entertainment.

[Reply] #45
04-05-2010 08:59 PM
Joined: 09-07-2007
Posts: 4,399
offline
surferdude1212
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 56

The Butcher wrote:

Heart Break Kid wrote: You guys have seriously never opened a dictionary? :|

I have,but don’t read it.It’s not entertainment.



thats what im saying


__________________


[Reply] #46
04-05-2010 09:00 PM
Joined: 02-06-2010
Posts: 4,834
offline
AfterGlow.
AfterGlow.
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 78

The Butcher wrote:

Heart Break Kid wrote: You guys have seriously never opened a dictionary? :|

I have,but don’t read it.It’s not entertainment.



So you just looked at the pictures then?

[Reply] #47
04-05-2010 09:01 PM
Joined: 10-05-2007
Posts: 21,426
offline
Marly
Marly
that's enough... too far...
Rep: 190

The Butcher wrote:

Heart Break Kid wrote: You guys have seriously never opened a dictionary? :|

I have,but don’t read it.It’s not entertainment.



You’re really stabbing yourself in the feet by making that statement.


__________________

[Reply] #48
04-05-2010 09:01 PM
Joined: 02-06-2010
Posts: 4,834
offline
AfterGlow.
AfterGlow.
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 78

surferdude1212 wrote:

The Butcher wrote:

Heart Break Kid wrote: You guys have seriously never opened a dictionary? :|

I have,but don’t read it.It’s not entertainment.



thats what im saying



No, you’re saying that you’re an idiot who doesn’t understand that whenever you’ve looked up a word in a dictionary, you’ve read something.

[Reply] #49
04-05-2010 09:01 PM
Joined: 11-09-2008
Posts: 30,879
offline
Aigis
Aigis
Eat shit Parker
Rep: 144

AfterGlow wrote:

The Butcher wrote:

Heart Break Kid wrote: You guys have seriously never opened a dictionary? :|

I have,but don’t read it.It’s not entertainment.



So you just looked at the pictures then?

I only read it when I’m doing work.I don’t read that shit in my free time,I have better things to read.

Edited 04-05-2010 09:04 PM by Aigis
[Reply] #50
04-05-2010 09:02 PM
Joined: 10-05-2007
Posts: 21,426
offline
Marly
Marly
that's enough... too far...
Rep: 190

The Butcher wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

The Butcher wrote:

Heart Break Kid wrote: You guys have seriously never opened a dictionary? :|

I have,but don’t read it.It’s not entertainment.



So you just looked at the pictures then?

I only read it when I’m doing work.I don’t read that shit in my free time,I have better thing to read.



So you do read it. People read for various reasons, and the reason you stated is still applicable for 'reading.'


__________________

[Reply] #51
04-05-2010 09:03 PM
Joined: 11-01-2008
Posts: 9,231
offline
Shepard
Shepard
"Commander"
Rep: 95

The Butcher wrote: I’d still have books.I would be fine.

books wouldnt exist since its a form of technology basically everyone would be walking in a desert,grassland,or forest naked


__________________

Edited 04-05-2010 09:04 PM by Shepard
[Reply] #52
04-05-2010 09:03 PM
Joined: 09-07-2007
Posts: 4,399
offline
surferdude1212
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 56

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

The Butcher wrote:

Heart Break Kid wrote: You guys have seriously never opened a dictionary? :|

I have,but don’t read it.It’s not entertainment.



thats what im saying



No, you’re saying that you’re an idiot who doesn’t understand that whenever you’ve looked up a word in a dictionary, you’ve read something.



when i saw the word read i implied reading the whole thing, i have looked up words in the dictionary that i do not understand though if thats what your saying


__________________


[Reply] #53
04-05-2010 09:04 PM
Joined: 02-06-2010
Posts: 4,834
offline
AfterGlow.
AfterGlow.
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 78

The Butcher wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

The Butcher wrote:

Heart Break Kid wrote: You guys have seriously never opened a dictionary? :|

I have,but don’t read it.It’s not entertainment.



So you just looked at the pictures then?

I only read it when I’m doing work.I don’t read that shit in my free time,I have better thing to read.



So in other words, you’ve looked up things in the dictionary, you’ve read things that were written.

Where the hell is it implied that reading something only applies to reading things during your free-time for entertainment?

[Reply] #54
04-05-2010 09:06 PM
Joined: 11-09-2008
Posts: 30,879
offline
Aigis
Aigis
Eat shit Parker
Rep: 144

AfterGlow wrote:

The Butcher wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

The Butcher wrote:

Heart Break Kid wrote: You guys have seriously never opened a dictionary? :|

I have,but don’t read it.It’s not entertainment.



So you just looked at the pictures then?

I only read it when I’m doing work.I don’t read that shit in my free time,I have better thing to read.



So in other words, you’ve looked up things in the dictionary, you’ve read things that were written.

Where the hell is it implied that reading something only applies to reading things during your free-time for entertainment?

It sounded like you read it in YOUR free time straight.

Oh,and lawl for saying I read it only for pictures,you obviously have not been to the Literature section.

Edited 04-05-2010 09:08 PM by Aigis
[Reply] #55
04-05-2010 09:08 PM
Joined: 02-06-2010
Posts: 4,834
offline
AfterGlow.
AfterGlow.
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 78

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

The Butcher wrote:

Heart Break Kid wrote: You guys have seriously never opened a dictionary? :|

I have,but don’t read it.It’s not entertainment.



thats what im saying



No, you’re saying that you’re an idiot who doesn’t understand that whenever you’ve looked up a word in a dictionary, you’ve read something.



when i saw the word read i implied reading the whole thing, i have looked up words in the dictionary that i do not understand though if thats what your saying



Don’t assume stupid things.

If you’re familiar with dictionaries, you know that "*Verb*; the act of *verbing*" is often how the definition of a word is started, and synonyms are added to the end.
You’re just making an ass of yourself trying to say that the definition of something is stupid because it included that definition.

[Reply] #56
04-05-2010 09:11 PM
Joined: 09-07-2007
Posts: 4,399
offline
surferdude1212
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 56

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

The Butcher wrote:

Heart Break Kid wrote: You guys have seriously never opened a dictionary? :|

I have,but don’t read it.It’s not entertainment.



thats what im saying



No, you’re saying that you’re an idiot who doesn’t understand that whenever you’ve looked up a word in a dictionary, you’ve read something.



when i saw the word read i implied reading the whole thing, i have looked up words in the dictionary that i do not understand though if thats what your saying



Don’t assume stupid things.

If you’re familiar with dictionaries, you know that "*Verb*; the act of *verbing*" is often how the definition of a word is started, and synonyms are added to the end.
You’re just making an ass of yourself trying to say that the definition of something is stupid because it included that definition.



never said it was stupid just said that i find it funny


__________________


[Reply] #57
04-05-2010 09:11 PM
Joined: 02-06-2010
Posts: 4,834
offline
AfterGlow.
AfterGlow.
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 78

The Butcher wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

The Butcher wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

The Butcher wrote:

Heart Break Kid wrote: You guys have seriously never opened a dictionary? :|

I have,but don’t read it.It’s not entertainment.



So you just looked at the pictures then?

I only read it when I’m doing work.I don’t read that shit in my free time,I have better thing to read.



So in other words, you’ve looked up things in the dictionary, you’ve read things that were written.

Where the hell is it implied that reading something only applies to reading things during your free-time for entertainment?

It sounded like you read it in YOUR free time straight.

Oh,ad lawl for saying I read it only for pictures,you obviously have not been to the Literature section.



“I’ve opened dictionaries, but I don’t read it, derp”
“Then what do you do, look at the pictures?"

I was pulling your leg for not understanding that the act of reading implies the reading of anything, from a single word, to a sentence, to part of or an entire book, for whatever reason.

[Reply] #58
04-05-2010 09:12 PM
Joined: 11-01-2008
Posts: 9,231
offline
Shepard
Shepard
"Commander"
Rep: 95

God wrote:

The Butcher wrote: I’d still have books.I would be fine.

books wouldnt exist since its a form of technology basically everyone would be walking in a desert,grassland,or forest naked

Lol


__________________

[Reply] #59
04-05-2010 09:14 PM
Joined: 02-06-2010
Posts: 4,834
offline
AfterGlow.
AfterGlow.
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 78

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

The Butcher wrote:

Heart Break Kid wrote: You guys have seriously never opened a dictionary? :|

I have,but don’t read it.It’s not entertainment.



thats what im saying



No, you’re saying that you’re an idiot who doesn’t understand that whenever you’ve looked up a word in a dictionary, you’ve read something.



when i saw the word read i implied reading the whole thing, i have looked up words in the dictionary that i do not understand though if thats what your saying



Don’t assume stupid things.

If you’re familiar with dictionaries, you know that "*Verb*; the act of *verbing*" is often how the definition of a word is started, and synonyms are added to the end.
You’re just making an ass of yourself trying to say that the definition of something is stupid because it included that definition.



never said it was stupid just said that i find it funny



I find it “funny” that you find it funny, since it implies an unfamiliarity with dictionaries.

Funny being a synonym for laughable.

[Reply] #60
04-05-2010 09:15 PM
Joined: 11-01-2008
Posts: 9,231
offline
Shepard
Shepard
"Commander"
Rep: 95

My point still stands


__________________

<< First < Prev 1 2 [3] 4 Next > Last >>

New Reply
Name (guest):

For faster posting and no restrictions: [Login] [Register]

Message:


 
 

[More Options] [New Topic]
Moderated by: Raziel, Zeroextra, - FS -, Admins, Superusers [All moderators]
The Lounge Forums ©Silicon.dk ApS 2012 - Privacy Policy - Disclaimer - FAQ - Contact