Remember me
[Forgot password?] [Register]
[Login]
menu

what would the world be without tech. !

<< First < Prev 1 [2] 3 4 Next > Last >>

[Reply] #21
04-05-2010 08:20 PM
Joined: 11-09-2008
Posts: 30,879
offline
Aigis
Aigis
Eat shit Parker
Rep: 144

[Reply] #22
04-05-2010 08:25 PM
Joined: 09-07-2007
Posts: 4,399
offline
surferdude1212
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 56

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote: Oh, and what discussion is that?

A bunch of immature brats failing to understand what technology implies? Oh, wait, that’s not a discussion.

You spamming some retarded BS about how this thread wouldn’t exist? Oh, wait, that’s not a discussion either.



oh yes it is, it is considered a discussion if multiple people talk about the same subject



Christ, you don’t even know what a fucking discussion is!
Definition: The act of discussing or exchanging reasons; examination by argument; debate; disputation; agitation.

You spamming some moronic bullshit about the thread not existing which pretty much the rest of the people ignored isn’t even close to anything similar to a discussion, and then going as far in your ignorance as claiming that you’ve started a new discussion is fucking ridiculous.

And that you have the fucking nerve trying to dominate the thread with your fucking unrelated, off-topic bullshit that nobody cares about and telling people to get out if they don’t want to participate in your spamming just proves how utterly stupid you are.



rofl

first off, you’ve been trolled
second off, rest of the people ignored my post? someone else quoted it and u seem to referred to it so therefore it is not ignored
third off, the off-topic bullshit rofl, this section is called off-topic for a reason
and finally, when the hell did i say get out if you dont want to participate?

also rofl at that definition, in it, it has a different version of the verb discuss XD fail def


__________________


Edited 04-05-2010 08:26 PM by surferdude1212
[Reply] #23
04-05-2010 08:33 PM
Joined: 02-06-2010
Posts: 4,834
offline
AfterGlow.
AfterGlow.
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 78

I see people are still discussing your post about this thread not existing? Oh wait, nobody discussed it to begin with.

Some other troll quoted it to get a foothold for further trolling/OT.

The thread is in the off-topic section because the subject doesn’t fit in another section, this doesn’t mean that it’s free to spam it with off-topic remarks.

Stick to the subject or don’t post.
I pointed out that this thread is worthless because the creator didn’t contribute anything to it or even bothered to specify what technology she was referring to.

surferdude1212 wrote: it started a different discussion in which you dont like to be a part of so dont complain



“Don’t complain about me spamming the thread, take part in it or STFU, derp”

surferdude1212 wrote: also rofl at that definition, in it, it has a different version of the verb discuss XD fail def



It’s called synonyms retard.

Edited 04-05-2010 08:36 PM by AfterGlow.
[Reply] #24
04-05-2010 08:36 PM
Joined: 12-14-2009
Posts: 6,655
offline
Fabulous Falsey
Fabulous Falsey
Pale Horse
Rep: 116

By argueing with him you’ve proved yourself wrong Aftery. Arguement = Conversation = Discussion


__________________

Cid wrote: Anybody that thinks Falsey has any intentions of being a productive member, much less than bettering the site, is a moron.

Edited 04-05-2010 08:36 PM by Fabulous Falsey
[Reply] #25
04-05-2010 08:36 PM
Joined: 01-31-2008
Posts: 55,431
offline
Xehanort the Younger
Xehanort the Younger
Not the bald one
Rep: 344

More than likely the thread creator was referring to things from 20th century-now. Things like cars, computers,etc.

At least that is the usual thought of technology. Technology is pretty vague though.

[Reply] #26
04-05-2010 08:37 PM
Joined: 07-15-2008
Posts: 6,710
offline
Rorschach
Rorschach
Horny4Ponies
Rep: 107

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote: Oh, and what discussion is that?

A bunch of immature brats failing to understand what technology implies? Oh, wait, that’s not a discussion.

You spamming some retarded BS about how this thread wouldn’t exist? Oh, wait, that’s not a discussion either.



oh yes it is, it is considered a discussion if multiple people talk about the same subject



Christ, you don’t even know what a fucking discussion is!
Definition: The act of discussing or exchanging reasons; examination by argument; debate; disputation; agitation.

You spamming some moronic bullshit about the thread not existing which pretty much the rest of the people ignored isn’t even close to anything similar to a discussion, and then going as far in your ignorance as claiming that you’ve started a new discussion is fucking ridiculous.

And that you have the fucking nerve trying to dominate the thread with your fucking unrelated, off-topic bullshit that nobody cares about and telling people to get out if they don’t want to participate in your spamming just proves how utterly stupid you are.



rofl

first off, you’ve been trolled
second off, rest of the people ignored my post? someone else quoted it and u seem to referred to it so therefore it is not ignored
third off, the off-topic bullshit rofl, this section is called off-topic for a reason
and finally, when the hell did i say get out if you dont want to participate?

also rofl at that definition, in it, it has a different version of the verb discuss XD fail def



Hurr.

[Reply] #27
04-05-2010 08:38 PM
Joined: 02-06-2010
Posts: 4,834
offline
AfterGlow.
AfterGlow.
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 78

FalseMemorySyndrome wrote: By argueing with him you’ve proved yourself wrong Aftery. Arguement = Conversation = Discussion



No, we’re discussing something else now, it has got nothing to do with his previous statement of there being a discussion prior.

[Reply] #28
04-05-2010 08:39 PM
Joined: 09-07-2007
Posts: 4,399
offline
surferdude1212
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 56

AfterGlow wrote: I see people are still discussing your post about this thread not existing? Oh wait, nobody discussed it to begin with.

Some other troll quoted it to get a foothold for further trolling/OT.

The thread is in the off-topic section because the subject doesn’t fit in another section, this doesn’t mean that it’s free to spam it with off-topic remarks.

Stick to the subject or don’t post.
I pointed out that this thread is worthless because the creator didn’t contribute anything to it or even bothered to specify what technology she was referring to.

surferdude1212 wrote: it started a different discussion in which you dont like to be a part of so dont complain



“Don’t complain about me spamming the thread, take part of it or STFU, derp”

surferdude1212 wrote: also rofl at that definition, in it, it has a different version of the verb discuss XD fail def



It’s called synonyms retard.



do u really think i said take part or STFU? rofl

and that definition part wasnt about calling you fail i was calling the definition fail for using a dif form of the word, and thats not a synonym. by saying discuss is a synonym for discussion is like saying run is a synonym for running

so dont be getting all mad cause im screwing around


__________________


Edited 04-05-2010 08:40 PM by surferdude1212
[Reply] #29
04-05-2010 08:40 PM
Joined: 02-06-2010
Posts: 4,834
offline
AfterGlow.
AfterGlow.
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 78

Rorschach wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote: Oh, and what discussion is that?

A bunch of immature brats failing to understand what technology implies? Oh, wait, that’s not a discussion.

You spamming some retarded BS about how this thread wouldn’t exist? Oh, wait, that’s not a discussion either.



oh yes it is, it is considered a discussion if multiple people talk about the same subject



Christ, you don’t even know what a fucking discussion is!
Definition: The act of discussing or exchanging reasons; examination by argument; debate; disputation; agitation.

You spamming some moronic bullshit about the thread not existing which pretty much the rest of the people ignored isn’t even close to anything similar to a discussion, and then going as far in your ignorance as claiming that you’ve started a new discussion is fucking ridiculous.

And that you have the fucking nerve trying to dominate the thread with your fucking unrelated, off-topic bullshit that nobody cares about and telling people to get out if they don’t want to participate in your spamming just proves how utterly stupid you are.



rofl

first off, you’ve been trolled
second off, rest of the people ignored my post? someone else quoted it and u seem to referred to it so therefore it is not ignored
third off, the off-topic bullshit rofl, this section is called off-topic for a reason
and finally, when the hell did i say get out if you dont want to participate?

also rofl at that definition, in it, it has a different version of the verb discuss XD fail def



Hurr.



I LOL’d, it’s funny cuz it’s true.

[Reply] #30
04-05-2010 08:42 PM
Joined: 09-07-2007
Posts: 4,399
offline
surferdude1212
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 56

AfterGlow wrote:

Rorschach wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote: Oh, and what discussion is that?

A bunch of immature brats failing to understand what technology implies? Oh, wait, that’s not a discussion.

You spamming some retarded BS about how this thread wouldn’t exist? Oh, wait, that’s not a discussion either.



oh yes it is, it is considered a discussion if multiple people talk about the same subject



Christ, you don’t even know what a fucking discussion is!
Definition: The act of discussing or exchanging reasons; examination by argument; debate; disputation; agitation.

You spamming some moronic bullshit about the thread not existing which pretty much the rest of the people ignored isn’t even close to anything similar to a discussion, and then going as far in your ignorance as claiming that you’ve started a new discussion is fucking ridiculous.

And that you have the fucking nerve trying to dominate the thread with your fucking unrelated, off-topic bullshit that nobody cares about and telling people to get out if they don’t want to participate in your spamming just proves how utterly stupid you are.



rofl

first off, you’ve been trolled
second off, rest of the people ignored my post? someone else quoted it and u seem to referred to it so therefore it is not ignored
third off, the off-topic bullshit rofl, this section is called off-topic for a reason
and finally, when the hell did i say get out if you dont want to participate?

also rofl at that definition, in it, it has a different version of the verb discuss XD fail def



Hurr.



I LOL’d, it’s funny cuz it’s true.



i lold too but thats not whats happening


__________________


[Reply] #31
04-05-2010 08:42 PM
Joined: 02-06-2010
Posts: 4,834
offline
AfterGlow.
AfterGlow.
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 78

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote: I see people are still discussing your post about this thread not existing? Oh wait, nobody discussed it to begin with.

Some other troll quoted it to get a foothold for further trolling/OT.

The thread is in the off-topic section because the subject doesn’t fit in another section, this doesn’t mean that it’s free to spam it with off-topic remarks.

Stick to the subject or don’t post.
I pointed out that this thread is worthless because the creator didn’t contribute anything to it or even bothered to specify what technology she was referring to.

surferdude1212 wrote: it started a different discussion in which you dont like to be a part of so dont complain



“Don’t complain about me spamming the thread, take part of it or STFU, derp”

surferdude1212 wrote: also rofl at that definition, in it, it has a different version of the verb discuss XD fail def



It’s called synonyms retard.



do u really think i said take part or STFU? rofl

and that definition part wasnt about calling you fail i was calling the definition fail for using a dif form of the word, and thats not a synonym. by saying discuss is a synonym for discussion is like saying run is a synonym for running

so dont be getting all mad cause im screwing around



Discussion: The act of discussing.

If you think there’s something wrong with this definition, you’re really stupid.

[Reply] #32
04-05-2010 08:45 PM
Joined: 09-07-2007
Posts: 4,399
offline
surferdude1212
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 56

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote: I see people are still discussing your post about this thread not existing? Oh wait, nobody discussed it to begin with.

Some other troll quoted it to get a foothold for further trolling/OT.

The thread is in the off-topic section because the subject doesn’t fit in another section, this doesn’t mean that it’s free to spam it with off-topic remarks.

Stick to the subject or don’t post.
I pointed out that this thread is worthless because the creator didn’t contribute anything to it or even bothered to specify what technology she was referring to.

surferdude1212 wrote: it started a different discussion in which you dont like to be a part of so dont complain



“Don’t complain about me spamming the thread, take part of it or STFU, derp”

surferdude1212 wrote: also rofl at that definition, in it, it has a different version of the verb discuss XD fail def



It’s called synonyms retard.



do u really think i said take part or STFU? rofl

and that definition part wasnt about calling you fail i was calling the definition fail for using a dif form of the word, and thats not a synonym. by saying discuss is a synonym for discussion is like saying run is a synonym for running

so dont be getting all mad cause im screwing around



Discussion: The act of discussing.

If you think there’s something wrong with this definition, you’re really stupid.



no i find it funny because the definition of the word is partly the word


__________________


[Reply] #33
04-05-2010 08:45 PM
Joined: 02-06-2010
Posts: 4,834
offline
AfterGlow.
AfterGlow.
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 78

Heart Break Kid wrote: More than likely the thread creator was referring to things from 20th century-now. Things like cars, computers,etc.

At least that is the usual thought of technology. Technology is pretty vague though.



It’s extremely vague.

There was plenty of technology during the 19th century.
It’s not a world without technology.

A world without technology would be the stone-age, before humans acquired enough intelligence to use tools.

So, we’d be animals, relying on instincts.

[Reply] #34
04-05-2010 08:46 PM
Joined: 04-17-2008
Posts: 706
offline
Toy Soldier 32000
Toy Soldier 32000
Regular
Rep: 15

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote: I see people are still discussing your post about this thread not existing? Oh wait, nobody discussed it to begin with.

Some other troll quoted it to get a foothold for further trolling/OT.

The thread is in the off-topic section because the subject doesn’t fit in another section, this doesn’t mean that it’s free to spam it with off-topic remarks.

Stick to the subject or don’t post.
I pointed out that this thread is worthless because the creator didn’t contribute anything to it or even bothered to specify what technology she was referring to.

surferdude1212 wrote: it started a different discussion in which you dont like to be a part of so dont complain



“Don’t complain about me spamming the thread, take part of it or STFU, derp”

surferdude1212 wrote: also rofl at that definition, in it, it has a different version of the verb discuss XD fail def



It’s called synonyms retard.



do u really think i said take part or STFU? rofl

and that definition part wasnt about calling you fail i was calling the definition fail for using a dif form of the word, and thats not a synonym. by saying discuss is a synonym for discussion is like saying run is a synonym for running

so dont be getting all mad cause im screwing around



Discussion: The act of discussing.

If you think there’s something wrong with this definition, you’re really stupid.


AfterGlow u mad

what would the world be without tech. !


__________________


communism is a mistress you later find out is a mister, and no number of salt baths will ever rinse you of the shame.

[Reply] #35
04-05-2010 08:46 PM
Joined: 02-06-2010
Posts: 4,834
offline
AfterGlow.
AfterGlow.
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 78

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote: I see people are still discussing your post about this thread not existing? Oh wait, nobody discussed it to begin with.

Some other troll quoted it to get a foothold for further trolling/OT.

The thread is in the off-topic section because the subject doesn’t fit in another section, this doesn’t mean that it’s free to spam it with off-topic remarks.

Stick to the subject or don’t post.
I pointed out that this thread is worthless because the creator didn’t contribute anything to it or even bothered to specify what technology she was referring to.

surferdude1212 wrote: it started a different discussion in which you dont like to be a part of so dont complain



“Don’t complain about me spamming the thread, take part of it or STFU, derp”

surferdude1212 wrote: also rofl at that definition, in it, it has a different version of the verb discuss XD fail def



It’s called synonyms retard.



do u really think i said take part or STFU? rofl

and that definition part wasnt about calling you fail i was calling the definition fail for using a dif form of the word, and thats not a synonym. by saying discuss is a synonym for discussion is like saying run is a synonym for running

so dont be getting all mad cause im screwing around



Discussion: The act of discussing.

If you think there’s something wrong with this definition, you’re really stupid.



no i find it funny because the definition of the word is partly the word



My God, have you never read a dictionary before?

[Reply] #36
04-05-2010 08:46 PM
Joined: 01-31-2008
Posts: 55,431
offline
Xehanort the Younger
Xehanort the Younger
Not the bald one
Rep: 344

AfterGlow wrote:

Heart Break Kid wrote: More than likely the thread creator was referring to things from 20th century-now. Things like cars, computers,etc.

At least that is the usual thought of technology. Technology is pretty vague though.



It’s extremely vague.

There was plenty of technology during the 19th century.
It’s not a world without technology.

A world without technology would be the stone-age, before humans acquired enough intelligence to use tools.

So, we’d be animals, relying on instincts.


And there we have it. Unless the TC comes in and says anything else about it.

[Reply] #37
04-05-2010 08:46 PM
Joined: 09-07-2007
Posts: 4,399
offline
surferdude1212
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 56

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote: I see people are still discussing your post about this thread not existing? Oh wait, nobody discussed it to begin with.

Some other troll quoted it to get a foothold for further trolling/OT.

The thread is in the off-topic section because the subject doesn’t fit in another section, this doesn’t mean that it’s free to spam it with off-topic remarks.

Stick to the subject or don’t post.
I pointed out that this thread is worthless because the creator didn’t contribute anything to it or even bothered to specify what technology she was referring to.

surferdude1212 wrote: it started a different discussion in which you dont like to be a part of so dont complain



“Don’t complain about me spamming the thread, take part of it or STFU, derp”

surferdude1212 wrote: also rofl at that definition, in it, it has a different version of the verb discuss XD fail def



It’s called synonyms retard.



do u really think i said take part or STFU? rofl

and that definition part wasnt about calling you fail i was calling the definition fail for using a dif form of the word, and thats not a synonym. by saying discuss is a synonym for discussion is like saying run is a synonym for running

so dont be getting all mad cause im screwing around



Discussion: The act of discussing.

If you think there’s something wrong with this definition, you’re really stupid.



no i find it funny because the definition of the word is partly the word



My God, have you never read a dictionary before?



really? read the dictionary?


__________________


[Reply] #38
04-05-2010 08:48 PM
Joined: 04-17-2008
Posts: 706
offline
Toy Soldier 32000
Toy Soldier 32000
Regular
Rep: 15

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote: I see people are still discussing your post about this thread not existing? Oh wait, nobody discussed it to begin with.

Some other troll quoted it to get a foothold for further trolling/OT.

The thread is in the off-topic section because the subject doesn’t fit in another section, this doesn’t mean that it’s free to spam it with off-topic remarks.

Stick to the subject or don’t post.
I pointed out that this thread is worthless because the creator didn’t contribute anything to it or even bothered to specify what technology she was referring to.

surferdude1212 wrote: it started a different discussion in which you dont like to be a part of so dont complain



“Don’t complain about me spamming the thread, take part of it or STFU, derp”

surferdude1212 wrote: also rofl at that definition, in it, it has a different version of the verb discuss XD fail def



It’s called synonyms retard.



do u really think i said take part or STFU? rofl

and that definition part wasnt about calling you fail i was calling the definition fail for using a dif form of the word, and thats not a synonym. by saying discuss is a synonym for discussion is like saying run is a synonym for running

so dont be getting all mad cause im screwing around



Discussion: The act of discussing.

If you think there’s something wrong with this definition, you’re really stupid.



no i find it funny because the definition of the word is partly the word



My God, have you never read a dictionary before?



really? read the dictionary?


dude i fucking read the dictionary every week its a cool story bro!


__________________


communism is a mistress you later find out is a mister, and no number of salt baths will ever rinse you of the shame.

[Reply] #39
04-05-2010 08:49 PM
Joined: 02-06-2010
Posts: 4,834
offline
AfterGlow.
AfterGlow.
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 78

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote:

surferdude1212 wrote:

AfterGlow wrote: I see people are still discussing your post about this thread not existing? Oh wait, nobody discussed it to begin with.

Some other troll quoted it to get a foothold for further trolling/OT.

The thread is in the off-topic section because the subject doesn’t fit in another section, this doesn’t mean that it’s free to spam it with off-topic remarks.

Stick to the subject or don’t post.
I pointed out that this thread is worthless because the creator didn’t contribute anything to it or even bothered to specify what technology she was referring to.

surferdude1212 wrote: it started a different discussion in which you dont like to be a part of so dont complain



“Don’t complain about me spamming the thread, take part of it or STFU, derp”

surferdude1212 wrote: also rofl at that definition, in it, it has a different version of the verb discuss XD fail def



It’s called synonyms retard.



do u really think i said take part or STFU? rofl

and that definition part wasnt about calling you fail i was calling the definition fail for using a dif form of the word, and thats not a synonym. by saying discuss is a synonym for discussion is like saying run is a synonym for running

so dont be getting all mad cause im screwing around



Discussion: The act of discussing.

If you think there’s something wrong with this definition, you’re really stupid.



no i find it funny because the definition of the word is partly the word



My God, have you never read a dictionary before?



really? read the dictionary?



What do you do? Teleport the written information into your head?

[Reply] #40
04-05-2010 08:50 PM
Joined: 01-31-2008
Posts: 55,431
offline
Xehanort the Younger
Xehanort the Younger
Not the bald one
Rep: 344

You guys have seriously never opened a dictionary? :|

<< First < Prev 1 [2] 3 4 Next > Last >>

New Reply
Name (guest):

For faster posting and no restrictions: [Login] [Register]

Message:


 
 

[More Options] [New Topic]
Moderated by: Raziel, Zeroextra, - FS -, Admins, Superusers [All moderators]
The Lounge Forums ©Silicon.dk ApS 2012 - Privacy Policy - Disclaimer - FAQ - Contact